Something bizarre is unfolding between Russia and China. On paper, they’re best friends—strategic partners without limits. But look closely, and the story gets weird. Russian media gushes over China, painting Xi Jinping as a wise and powerful leader, Russia’s best hope against the West. But in Beijing? It’s all business—careful language and subtle signals that China’s not planning to risk much for its troubled neighbor. It’s almost comical. Russia looks like a woman proudly telling everyone she’s about to marry the guy next door—just because he once borrowed her a screwdriver.
So what’s really going on here?

Today we’re going beyond the headlines—revealing what this so-called friendship really is: an alliance… or a silent betrayal.

So Alike, Yet So Different

Modern Russia and China have a lot in common. Both see themselves as the center of the world. In ancient and medieval times, China truly was the most advanced civilization on Earth, drawing the brightest minds into its orbit. Russia, on the other hand, viewed itself as the spiritual axis of the universe—the largest Orthodox power, the guardian of the one true faith.
Later, both nations saw themselves as the heart of the most “correct” ideology: communism. The only problem? They couldn’t agree on whose version—Chinese or Soviet—was the real one.
Both countries are steeped in nationalism and, frankly, racism. The “us versus them” mindset is one of the few forces that can unify their vast, fragmented societies. (I have a separate video that dives into how Russian racism works—it explains a lot.)
Both have longstanding conflicts with the West. For Russia, it’s historical rivalry over access to warm-water ports and recurring wars in Europe. For China, it’s the “Century of Humiliation” that began with the Opium Wars and culminated in its semi-colonial status in the early 20th century. (You can read about how Western colonists lived in Shanghai in my historical novel, The White Ghosts’ Empire.)
Both nations were shaped by communist philosophy, underwent cultural revolutions, endured totalitarian regimes, and paid a horrific price. Eventually, they learned the hard way that Marxist theory doesn’t work in practice, and began searching for some alternative that wouldn’t leave them hopelessly behind the West.
Today, both states are obsessed with controlling the past, maintaining appearances, and saving face. Impressing the world has become a national pastime. That’s why we get mega-projects, glittering Olympic ceremonies, and intimidating military drills.
On a personal level, it manifests as consumerism and performative wealth. Russians and Chinese alike love luxury brands, measure success in money, and constantly show off, mostly to themselves. Despite all their anti-Western rhetoric, both societies still crave Western validation. An artist is considered truly successful not when they top the charts in Moscow or Beijing, but when they win an Oscar in so-called “cursed America.”
Corruption runs deep in both systems. Faked reports, stolen budgets, kickbacks at every level. Power is feudal: at the top, an unmovable leader; beneath him, a handful of clans competing for control of various sectors. In both countries, people enter politics not to serve the public, but to enrich themselves and gain high status. A government position offers far more lucrative opportunities than any business, creative pursuit, or academic achievement.
Civil society is weak, the population atomized, and the state’s main tool is repression. In both countries, the government ensures that citizens have no real way to influence those in power.
The officials swear loyalty to the fatherland and the supreme leader—but their real goal is simple: steal and escape. Or at least stash their money abroad to protect it from domestic rivals, who could easily strip them of everything they’ve looted.
Both Russia and China face serious economic problems, capital flight, and demographic collapse. And both regimes are toying with the idea that a short, victorious war could help unite their crumbling societies.
Putin tried, aAnd now he’s neck-deep in disaster. 
Xi is still weighing his options on Taiwan. He wants it badly—but after watching Putin miscalculate so catastrophically, he’s not quite ready to roll the dice.

Shared Goals, Ancient Instincts

The most important thing uniting China and Russia isn’t love, trust, or shared history. It’s a common goal: to maintain authoritarian control while keeping the economy alive.
How to actually do that, however, remains a mystery. Because if you want to rule forever, you have to keep your people afraid. You need coercion, surveillance, and violence. But your citizens want freedom, prosperity, and a future. And your goals inevitably clash with theirs.
You want the money, freedom, and future for yourself.
In the past, rulers could rely on one advantage: peasants had nowhere to go. Abandoning your land meant abandoning your life. But in the 21st century, even the poorest people dream of escape. They move to other cities or other countries. And when people feel exploited, threatened, or unstable, they stop having children. No propaganda campaign can reverse that.
Both China and Russia owe their rise to one thing: trade with the West. The West wanted cheap resources from Russia and cheap goods from China, and gave little thought to who profited from the deals. In both cases, the West unintentionally funded the rise of two authoritarian powers now shaking the global order. It’s an old story: politicians solve today’s problems while offloading the consequences onto their children and grandchildren.
The Chinese and Russian elites responded in the most obvious way: They tightened control over whatever generates profit. And they want the world to function like 19th-century New York slums: each gang with its turf, the boss feeding off it, and no one daring to interfere. If there’s trouble, the cops can always be bribed.
This mindset isn’t just political—it’s biological. In primate societies, dominant males protect their territory, hoard resources, and crush challengers. Civilization is supposed to be humanity’s slow departure from these ancient instincts, an attempt to build systems that benefit everyone, not just the strongest.
But the problem is, these instincts still live inside us. They’re hardcoded into our behavior, and it takes real awareness to resist them. Authoritarian leaders don’t resist them. They lean in. They’re too busy performing dominance rituals, signaling strength, and defending tribal turf.
(If this idea intrigues you, I have a separate video explaining how these primal dynamics shape modern politics.)
That’s why Putin wants Ukraine. It has nothing to do with protecting Russian speakers. If that were the goal, he could’ve spent a fraction of the war’s cost resettling them in Russia—where the population is already shrinking.
And Xi’s obsession with Taiwan? It’s the same logic. Not justice—dominance. Not reunification—status. If he doesn’t claim it, he looks weak. And weakness is fatal in their worldview.
Strip away the propaganda, and what you’re left with is an ancient pattern of behavior:
 two beta males trying to weaken the alpha. On their own, they can’t take him. Together? Maybe they have a shot.
They don’t trust each other. They certainly don’t want the other to succeed. But right now, the alpha—Washington—is the biggest threat to their rank. And so, they strike a deal. A temporary alliance. A pact not of friendship, but of strategy. A very old instinct, dressed in modern suits.

An Uneasy Partnership

An alliance between two countries isn’t made on camera. A real partnership comes from the ground up—when people genuinely want to connect, share experiences, and celebrate each other’s successes. At its heart, that takes curiosity, respect, and a willingness to understand.
Yes, supreme leaders in authoritarian regimes can push policies from the top. But in reality, it’s the mid-level people—the officials, business owners, border guards, teachers, and police—who shape how things play out. If their leader says, “Trust our neighbor,” they’ll nod and say, “Yes, sir.” 
And then quietly do whatever seems best for their own situation.
That’s why it’s so important to look beyond the headlines and examine the real fabric of the relationship.
In the case of Russia and China, despite the enormous shared border and constant declarations of strategic unity, the truth is striking: the two societies barely know each other. And that ignorance goes all the way up the chain of command.
Why? Several reasons.
First, Russia’s border regions with China are sparsely populated. Most Russians live in the European part of the country. That’s where decisions are made, and that’s where the focus stays. In short, the people managing Russia’s China policy rarely interact with China at all.
Second, the language barrier. Young people in both countries study English. Chinese students often add Japanese or Korean. Russian? Not a priority. Only a small number of specialists and border traders speak it. And in Russia, the number of people studying Chinese is also tiny—mostly limited to businesspeople with direct trade interests.
Third, the education gap. Chinese students learn a simplified version of Russian history: 1917 Revolution, World War II, collapse of the USSR. Everything else—imperial expansion, the Gulag system, Putin’s state—is conveniently left out. Russian students get even less. Chinese history is practically invisible in school textbooks, reduced to a paragraph about the ancient world and a few scattered mentions.
Tourism doesn’t help either. Chinese travelers prefer Japan, Thailand, or Europe. Russia isn’t on most itineraries. Those who do visit often come in tightly organized tour groups, rarely interacting with locals. And as for Russians? Since sanctions closed the doors to the West, some have turned east. But traveling to China isn’t cheap. Only the wealthy—or those who live near the border—can manage it.
What all of this creates is mutual ignorance. And when politicians don’t understand their counterparts’ country, they fall back on myths, outdated stereotypes, and whatever story their advisors feed them.
For the Russian elite, this has led to a dangerous illusion that China is a flawless economic miracle, a green-energy powerhouse, and a technological marvel that proves democracy is unnecessary. In other words, they bought the Chinese propaganda and believed the version of China that Beijing wanted them to see.
That’s why Russian leaders seriously believed China would stand shoulder to shoulder with them in their war against the West. That China would step in, support the invasion of Ukraine, and help Russia come out on top.
But a lack of historical context came back to bite them. The Russian elite simply doesn’t understand how the Chinese view them.
Officially, Chinese state media and education systems are polite. They present the relationship as smooth and cooperative, but the reality is more complex. What we’re seeing now is a kind of strategic amnesia—a deliberate forgetting. China is ignoring old territorial grievances and diplomatic slights not out of loyalty, but because it serves their interests right now.
This is not friendship. It’s a temporary alignment—a cool, calculated arrangement that can change the moment the costs outweigh the benefits.

A History Written in Mistrust

Despite the polite language and staged summits of today, the history between Russia and China has been anything but smooth.
In the mid-19th century, China was collapsing under the weight of military defeats and civil unrest. Russia took advantage of the chaos, seizing vast territories in the northeast.
Today, the Kremlin publicly praises China, but don’t be fooled. Russian conquests are not seen as shameful, but as points of pride.
Need proof? Look no further than Russia’s largest banknote. The 5000-ruble bill features a statue of General Nikolay Muravyov-Amursky—the man responsible for the annexation of Chinese lands. That image says everything about how Russia still sees its neighbor.
In the early 20th century, the violence continued. In 1900, in the Russian city of Blagoveshchensk, thousands of ethnic Chinese were massacred—estimates range from 3,000 to 7,000. Chinese bandits retaliated, robbing Russian trains and steamboats. Russia responded with machine guns and raids on villages. No one showed mercy.
Facing a labor shortage during World War I, Russian contractors imported tens of thousands of Chinese workers. But after the 1917 revolution, when wages stopped, many of them joined the Bolsheviks as enforcers and helped suppress Russian opposition. I describe this period in detail in my historical novel, Russian Treasures.
Throughout the 1920s, the Soviet Union actively tried to ignite civil war in China, hoping it would lead to a communist victory. Moscow’s logic was strategic: if China, a critical part of the global economy, could be pulled out of the capitalist world, Western economies might collapse. That would trigger revolutions in Europe and America, and eventually, the whole planet would become a single, Soviet-led communist state.
To achieve that, Moscow played both sides, negotiating with the ruling government in Beijing and the communist opposition in the south. The result? Mass terror in China. But Soviet leaders didn’t care. Their racism, combined with ideological zeal, left no room for moral restraint. Anyone who resisted was a heretic—expendable.
Even after Mao’s communist regime took power, relations with the USSR were rocky. When Stalin died and his successors denounced his cult of personality, China rejected the move. Mao wasn’t ready for that reckoning. His Cultural Revolution, man-made famines, and mass purges were still ahead, mistakes the USSR had already lived through decades earlier. But neither country really understood the other. They took each other’s propaganda at face value.
The real conflict between Moscow and Beijing, as always, came down to primitive dominance games, this time over who would lead the communist world. Despite all the Soviet aid—money, weapons, and advisors—Mao had no intention of being anyone’s junior partner. Moscow was outraged. In 1969, tensions escalated into an actual border conflict—soldiers died on both sides.
The final split came in 1972, when U.S. President Richard Nixon visited China. His goal was to drive a wedge between the two communist powers. And it worked. Normalized relations with the U.S. gave China access to American markets, and that laid the foundation for its economic miracle.
The short-term strategy succeeded. But no one paused to consider what it might mean in the long run.

China’s Game of Control

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Xi Jinping has raised countless toasts to “no-limits cooperation.” But has China actually invested in Russia’s future? Not even close.
Direct investment dried up after 2022. No major new deals have materialized. Even Moscow’s request to issue yuan-denominated bonds was quietly blocked—a clear vote of no confidence. For all the summit fanfare, it’s mostly theater.
Trade continues, but on China’s terms. Walk into a Moscow car dealership today: nearly every model is Chinese. With Western brands gone, 90% of Russia’s imported cars now come from China, and average prices have nearly doubled. Russia sends crude oil, metals, and timber—cheap. China sends back electronics and machinery—expensive. It’s a colonial model in reverse.
And China won’t help Russia rise. It wants a buyer, not a builder. Russian businesses complain about overpriced, low-quality Chinese equipment, but there’s nowhere else to turn. Putin’s pivot has made Russia an economic hostage.
The irony? China is now quietly repaying its old debts. Once, Russia exploited China’s weakness—seizing land and interfering in its affairs. Now, Xi is doing the same: bleeding a weakened Russia dry, while smiling for the cameras.
It’s a calculated game. Xi wants Putin just desperate enough to stay loyal, but never strong enough to act alone. That’s why China sends just enough to keep Russia’s war machine turning—drones, chips, spare parts—but never tanks or missiles. Not enough to win. Just enough not to collapse.
And when the U.S. tightens sanctions? Chinese banks pause cooperation immediately. So much for loyalty. Beijing’s support is purely transactional—gone the moment it threatens Chinese interests.
Behind closed doors, Chinese officers mock the Russian army as a “negative example.” They’re not fighting alongside Russia; they’re learning from its mistakes to sharpen their own.
Putin thought a pivot to China would buy time and create a new Eurasian order, one led by equals. Instead, China got a client. Russia got the bill. And the dream of co-leadership? Gone.
What options are left? Rebuild ties with the West? That would mean admitting defeat in Ukraine, unthinkable for a regime built on pride and denial. Turn to India? New Delhi will take the oil, but not the burden. Europe? Off the table.
And while Russia flounders, China is quietly taking over Central Asia, building roads, cutting deals, and trading in yuan. Once Moscow’s backyard, now Xi’s playground. And Putin, tied to Beijing by dependence, can only watch.

The Strategic Dead End

Western strategists often wonder: can Russia and China be split? Can clever diplomacy pull Putin away from Xi?
No—not while these two men remain in power.
Some argue the West should offer Putin a way out, the same way it once helped communist China open its economy. But here’s how I see it:
If you rescue a dragon, don’t expect it to become friendly. He is a reptile, after all. It won’t roast marshmallows with you. It’ll recover and return to his old ways, deadlier than before.
Putin isn’t driven by compromise or national prosperity. His personality type is Hunter-Player, a man addicted to the thrill of winning. If you’re curious about these personality type system, there’s more on my site.)
To Putin, raw dominance is nature’s law. Cooperation, mutual benefit—those are fairy tales told by the weak.
The West’s message must be clear: If a leader behaves like a barbarian, he’ll face consequences. Appeasement only rewrites the rules in favor of violence. And China is watching—taking notes on what the world will tolerate.
The truth is, the fear of a powerful China–Russia alliance is overblown. There is no foundation for lasting friendship.
Russian elites have nothing to offer Beijing but cheap raw materials, and public sentiment at home is either indifferent to China or quietly afraid of it. On Russian social media, talk of becoming a “Chinese colony” is common. And it’s not satire. It’s fear.
Even the most hardened supporters of the war in Ukraine understand that China holds Russia’s economic lifeline. If Beijing cut off the supply of cars, machinery, or drone parts, the Russian economy would collapse in weeks.
And here’s the final irony.
Russian propaganda spent years warning that the evil West would come, loot the country, and impose its will. But in the end?
It wasn’t the West. It was China. Oops.

Powered by