What Jeffrey Epstein did was monstrous. The victims deserve justice. Full stop.

But here’s what bothers me: the public conversation keeps getting trapped on the most cinematic details — the island, the plane, the photos, the “who was on the list.”

It’s like staring at the bloodstain… and never asking who fired the gun. And why.

Epstein wasn’t just a predator. He was a service. A broker. A gatekeeper to a private zone where certain people could test one another, bind one another, and quietly trade protection.

I grew up in the Soviet Union, and watching this story unfold, I recognize a mechanism Americans don’t usually name. In Russian, we have a word for it: blat.

Blat is not just corruption. Corruption is a crime. Blat is an operating system: a shadow network of favors, introductions, exemptions, and mutual compromise — where the real power doesn’t live in institutions. It lives in access.

And that brings us to the real question: What if the Epstein saga is not primarily a sex story…  but a governance story? What if it’s a warning sign that parts of the elite started behaving less like citizens under law… and more like a closed circle that runs on “I can fix this for you” and “you owe me”?

Today I’ll show you why this scandal isn’t only about individual depravity — it’s about what happens when rules become theater, and “backstage connections” become the real constitution.

Here’s our roadmap:

• Blat Explained — how a broken system turns favors into oxygen
• The Forbidden Zone — where elites signal exemption from normal rules
• Epstein the Fixer — what he really sold, and why it wasn’t “sex”
• Institutional Collapse — when law becomes performance and brokers become judges
• The Soviet Future — what it looks like when a country normalizes this

Blat Explained

Blat is what happens when the official rules still exist on paper, but following them doesn’t do you much good. People in the West hear “blat” and translate it as “corruption”. That’s too small. Corruption is one crime. Blat is a whole social operating system.

The clean definition is: you use personal networks to get what the formal system cannot give you. In the Soviet Union, this was normal life.

You could be a good student. You could follow every rule. You could show up on time, pay what you were told to pay, stand in the official line like a decent citizen. And still get cheated.

When I was a child, my friend Olya explained this to me with something almost comical: gold teeth. Her mother worked as a flight attendant on international routes. She brought home things other people couldn’t get — colorful hair ties, pens with caps, sometimes even lace underwear.

People who wanted these kinds of things needed someone like her. So they turned her into a “friend”.

They never said, “You’ll owe me later.” They said, “We’re friends.”

They showed up with gifts. They stayed in touch. They did small favors before you even asked. Over time, something invisible accumulated, a quiet debt that could be called in when it mattered.

Now think about the gold tooth.

If you were an ordinary citizen and wanted one, you stepped into the system like a loyal believer. You brought your own gold. You handed it over. You hoped the dentist would do his job honestly, and that in a week or two you’d walk out with a bright, gleaming tooth, proof that you were doing well in life.

But here’s the trap. The dentist could quietly keep your gold and replace it with a cheap alloy — and you would never know. And even if you suspected something, you’d have no way to prove it.

But if you had blat, you didn’t walk in as “a customer”. You walked in as “Olya’s mom’s friend”. And suddenly the whole world changed. Suddenly, the dentist cared and did a great job.

That’s the sucker versus the connected person.

The sucker believes the official story: “Do the right thing and the system will reward you.”

The connected person knows the real story: “The system is a stage play. Real decisions happen backstage.”

And the most important character in this world is not the politician. It’s the broker.

Olya’s mother wasn’t a minister. She wasn’t a genius. She had something much more practical: access. Access to planes and foreign stores selling items that became social gold in a shortage economy.

That made her valuable to powerful people. And once powerful people need you, you become a node in their informal network. You become the person who can connect, arrange, smooth over, and quietly solve.

Everyone understands the rules are fake, so skirting the system becomes the system.

Now, I’d like to share a short book trailer for my upcoming novel, The Snow Queen’s Spring.

The Snow Queen’s Spring / Coming Soon

The Forbidden Zone

Blat can only flourish where there is scarcity. If everyone has enough, people simply look for the best seller and the best price. They don’t need brokers and unofficial networks.

But in the West, there is something that remains acutely scarce — something no amount of money can buy. Membership in the club of those who shape destinies.

America is full of millionaires and even billionaires. That alone does not make you special. And yet being special is precisely what modern culture demands of the ambitious person. It’s not enough to succeed. You must demonstrate something extraordinary.

There is an older force at work, a behavioral program inherited from our distant ancestors. It pushes in one direction: You must do whatever it takes to be accepted by the Big, Powerful Hunters who rule the tribe. And not merely accepted — accepted as an equal.

If you regularly browse the websites of people striving for success, you’ll notice how carefully they signal their uniqueness. “I won this competition.” “I received that award.” And very often — photographs embracing famous figures. If a celebrity stands next to you for a camera, it instantly marks you as someone important. In the eyes of the viewer, you are the one who have access to fame, money, and power.

The same logic operates at the very top. But there, a photo is not enough. Something stronger is required. Something exclusive. And it doesn’t need to be invented. It emerges automatically from our ancient behavioral code.

In a prehistoric tribe, you were admitted into the brotherhood of hunters only after passing an initiation ritual. It had to be difficult. At the early stages, that meant pain, public humiliation, or a test of fear. Boys might be forced to endure ant bites without flinching, or spend a night alone in the forest.

But the next stage is more revealing: the violation of taboos. The very rules that bind everyone else no longer bind you. They are still sacred for the tribe, but not for you, because you are now different.

We see echoes of this throughout history. In Ancient Rome, only the emperor could wear purple — a boundary so absolute that crossing it was treason. In Imperial China, only the emperor could wear the five-clawed dragon on his robes. 

In medieval Japan, a samurai possessed the legal privilege to strike down a commoner who had insulted him. An act that would be murder for anyone else became a sanctioned assertion of status.

And the same logic echoes today. A priest may enter the altar; ordinary worshippers may not.
No one is allowed to run a red light, except a police car or a fire truck. VIP passes at Disneyland let some people bypass lines that everyone else must endure.

Access signals status. Exemption signals power.

In the modern world, much like in Ancient Rome or Imperial China, what separates the “elite” from everyone else is the ability to cross lines that would ruin an ordinary person’s life. The old phrase captures it perfectly: what is permitted to Jupiter is not permitted to an ox.

This pattern feels natural because it aligns with our pre-installed software. It doesn’t require instruction. It activates on its own.

Institutions are meant to restrain that instinct. That’s one of their core purposes. But the instinct itself never disappears. It simply looks for a channel.

If the channel is healthy, that same drive turns into competition, bold but lawful risk-taking, building companies, funding innovation, and practicing transparent, accountable philanthropy — ambition that still operates within guardrails. The hunger for status remains. But it is civilized.

If the channel is rotten, it turns into a “forbidden zone”. A private world where rules exist mainly to be broken.

The forbidden act sends a signal inside the circle: We are different. We are above.

But the second half of the mechanism matters even more. It’s not simply crossing a line.
It’s crossing it without consequences. It’s doing something that would destroy anyone else, and walking away untouched.

That protection becomes intoxicating. And it becomes a social glue. If you and I have crossed a line together, we are no longer just acquaintances. We share exposure. Not friendship — dependence.

This is where blat enters the forbidden zone. In a favor-based system, networks are not held together by contracts or transparency. They are held together by mutual compromise — by secrets, by dirt, by the quiet fear that if one falls, others fall too.

And layered on top of that fear is something else: the thrill of exemption. The intoxicating sense that accountability applies to everyone else.

That is why Epstein matters beyond the lurid details. He was not merely facilitating crimes. He was managing a forbidden zone inside a modern country that insists such zones do not exist.

Epstein the Fixer

Jeffrey Epstein was not the center of the story. He was a service.

If you look at him as a “monster”, you end up hunting for names like it’s a murder mystery. If you look at him through blat, you see a different thing: a broker who made the forbidden zone run smoothly.

In the Soviet world, a broker doesn’t need an official title. He needs leverage, introductions, and a reputation for making opportunities appear and obstacles quietly vanish. That’s it. People came to him because they craved something they couldn’t obtain through official channels.

He becomes the hallway between locked doors.

Epstein was not selling lace lingerie or imported toothpaste. He was selling access to a modern initiation ritual. Entry into a circle where power was so concentrated that it appeared to guarantee something priceless: impunity. And this, in a country that officially insists no one stands above the law.

That is the seduction.

If this were only about private perversions, the visitors to Epstein’s island could have satisfied their appetites quietly, without creating a trail and risking exposure. But discretion was never the point. The point was visibility — not to the public, but to the other mighty hunters in the circle. To demonstrate that you could cross a forbidden line and walk away untouched. That you could break a taboo and nothing would happen. And if nothing happens to you, it sends a message: “You are one of us.”

And here’s the part I want you to sit with.

When America reacts with disgust, that is a healthy reflex.

There’s a visual image for this in the work of Mikhail Zoshchenko, a Russian writer. In the 1920s, light bulbs were placed in a communal apartment that had no electricity before. The occupants believed their place was cozy. But when they turned the lights on, they saw the shabby walls, the dirty floor, and the insects. The sight was revulsive, but it made them realize how much work this place needed to become nice.

Something like this happened when Epstein’s forbidden zone was exposed. The ugliness used to hide in the darkness, but now it’s in the spotlight. A normal person feels disgust, then an urge to clean this mess. That’s how progress happens.

Epstein story isn’t only about sex. It’s about a society deciding, slowly, what kind of elite it wants to tolerate. And how to channel the elite’s desire to feel special into something that benefits everyone.

Institutional Collapse

Blat does not start with evil people. It starts with weak institutions.

In the Soviet Union, the state promised everything and delivered shortages. So people built a second system, made of favors, friends, and quiet debts.

America is not the Soviet Union. But the logic is starting to rhyme. More and more citizens feel the same split: the official story says “rules apply”, but daily life says “rules apply differently”.

When that gap widens, you need an army of fixers.

You can actually see this in the numbers. Trust and confidence in major institutions has been sliding for years, across parties, but in different directions at different moments. People argue about who “caused” it, but the outcome is the same: cynicism becomes rational, not edgy.

And cynicism creates demand for blat.

When people believe the system is fair, they try to win inside the system. But when people believe the system is theater, they try to win outside it. 

The Soviet Future

Here’s the warning, and it’s not a conspiracy theory.

America is drifting from a system of laws into a system of favors where the real action moves into informal networks, and the formal system becomes a performance for the public.

That is exactly how the late Soviet Union felt.

You still had slogans, procedures, and rules posted on the wall. But everybody knew the real question was: who can make the rule bend.

In that world, you don’t need a single mastermind or a secret committee. You need a large class of people who are rationally adapting to a broken environment.

And you need one more ingredient.

You need “suckers”. Normal people who still try to do things cleanly. People who still think good behavior will be rewarded. People who don’t have time, money, or connections to build a private reality.

They get told, “Follow the rules.” And they do. Then they watch the connected class glide past them. 

When that lesson sinks in, it changes behavior. People stop believing that fairness is even a meaningful concept. And then they start looking for their own small version of blat, because nobody wants to be the last honest person in a rigged game.

That’s how a country becomes Soviet without noticing.

America still has a chance to choose a different path. And the evidence is simple: when the light turns on, people still feel disgust.

Hold on to that disgust. It isn’t hysteria. It’s a moral reflex, the instinct of a society that still believes in laws, not circles.

Powered by